Much like Will of the Many last year, The Raven Scholar has taken my little corner of the internet by storm. It’s a mystery, but not a mystery. A tournament arc, but for adults not teenagers. It’s got a scholar main character, but feels as ambitious as epic fantasy! The hype is real, and I’m seeing a lot of people rave about this as their book of the year.
I’m a little bit more pessimistic than most. It’s a good book, and I absolutely intend to pursue the sequels. However, I think there are more issues than a typical review is ready to admit. If you’re willing to commit to the premise and enjoy the ride, I think it’s absolutely worth a read. If you like internal consistency, this book may get under your skin.

Elevator Pitch:
Neema rose to the leader of the Ravens through her research that captured the eye of the Emperor. She also wrote an execution writ for a 16 year old daughter of a noble family living in squalor after her father’s attempted coup. The time has come to select a new Emperor. The Raven representative is her childhood nemesis, the Fox contender is her ex-boyfriend, the Hound contender carried it out, and the Tiger contender is the dead girl’s twin brother. When a contender turns up dead, Neema is thrust into an investigatory role, into the competition to decide the next Emperor, and into the attention of the gods she resolutely believes don’t actually exist.
Read if Looking For: readable prose, sassy ravens, tournament(ish) arcs, mystery(ish) plots, political maneuvering to set up for an epic fantasy trilogy, tropes executed in fun ways
Avoid if You Dislike: the nagging voice in the back of your head reminding you that the explanations for badass twists don’t make sense if you think very hard about what’s happening, a protagonist whom everyone hates for no discernable reason








